You need to indicate the reasoning behind your choice. The grounds for comparison anticipates the comparative nature of your thesis.As in any argumentative paper, your thesis statement will convey the gist of your argument, which necessarily follows from your frame of reference. But in a compare-and-contrast, the thesis depends on how the two things you've chosen to compare actually relate to one another.
Thus, in a paper comparing how two writers redefine social norms of masculinity, you would be better off"ng a sociologist on the topic of masculinity than spinning out potentially banal-sounding theories of your own. Most assignments tell you exactly what the frame of reference should be, and most courses supply sources for constructing. If you encounter an assignment that fails to provide a frame of reference, you must come up with one on your own.A paper without such a context would have no angle on the material, no focus or frame for the writer to propose a meaningful argument. Let's say you're writing a paper on global food distribution, and you've chosen to compare apples and oranges.Why these particular fruits? Why not pears and bananas? The rationale behind your choice, the grounds for comparison, lets your reader know why your choice is deliberate and meaningful, not random. For instance, in a paper asking how the "discourse of domesticity" has been used in the abortion debate, the grounds for comparison are obvious; the issue has two conflicting sides, pro-choice and pro-life.In a paper comparing the effects of acid homework help in spanish rain on two forest sites, your choice of sites is less obvious. A paper focusing on similarly aged forest stands in Maine and the Catskills will be set up differently from one comparing a new forest stand in the White Mountains with an old forest in the same region.
Predictably, the thesis of such a paper is usually an assertion that A and B are very similar yet not so similar after all. To write a good compare-and-contrast paper, you must take your raw datathe similarities and differences you've observedand make them cohere into a meaningful argument.Here are the five elements required. This is the context within which you place the two things you plan to compare and contrast; it is the umbrella under which you have grouped them.The frame of reference may consist of an idea, theme, question, problem, or theory; a group of similar things from which you extract two for special attention; biographical or historical write me a essay information. The best frames of reference are constructed from specific sources rather than your own thoughts or observations.
Throughout your academic career, you'll be asked to write papers in which you compare and contrast two things: two texts, two theories, two historical figures, two scientific processes, and. "Classic" compare-and-contrast papers, in which you weight A and B equally, may be about two similar things that have crucial differences (two pesticides with different effects on the environment) or two similar things that have crucial differences, yet make term paper longer turn out to have surprising commonalities (two.In the "lens" (or "keyhole comparison, in which you weight A less heavily than B, you use A as a lens through which to view. Just as looking through a pair of glasses changes the way you see an object, using A as a framework for understanding B changes the way you see. Lens comparisons are useful for illuminating, critiquing, or challenging the stability of a thing that, before the analysis, seemed perfectly understood.Often, lens comparisons take time into account: earlier texts, events, or historical figures may illuminate later ones, and vice versa. Faced with a daunting list of seemingly unrelated similarities and differences, you may feel confused about how to construct a paper that isn't just a mechanical exercise in which you first state all the features that A and B have in common, and then state.